prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Presuda na temelju sporazuma stranaka
No public access
master's thesis
Presuda na temelju sporazuma stranaka
2023. urn:nbn:hr:170:342968
Roso, Anica
University of Split
Faculty of Law

Cite this document

Roso, A. (2023). Presuda na temelju sporazuma stranaka (Master's thesis). Split: University of Split, Faculty of Law. Retrieved from https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:170:342968

Roso, Anica. "Presuda na temelju sporazuma stranaka." Master's thesis, University of Split, Faculty of Law, 2023. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:170:342968

Roso, Anica. "Presuda na temelju sporazuma stranaka." Master's thesis, University of Split, Faculty of Law, 2023. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:170:342968

Roso, A. (2023). 'Presuda na temelju sporazuma stranaka', Master's thesis, University of Split, Faculty of Law, accessed 24 March 2025, https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:170:342968

Roso A. Presuda na temelju sporazuma stranaka [Master's thesis]. Split: University of Split, Faculty of Law; 2023 [cited 2025 March 24] Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:170:342968

A. Roso, "Presuda na temelju sporazuma stranaka", Master's thesis, University of Split, Faculty of Law, Split, 2023. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:170:342968

Metadata
TitlePresuda na temelju sporazuma stranaka
AuthorAnica Roso
MentorMatko Pajčić (mentor)
Committee memberMarina Carić (predsjednik povjerenstva)
Committee memberMatko Pajčić (član povjerenstva)
Committee memberMarija Đuzel (član povjerenstva)
GranterUniversity of Split
Faculty of Law
Split
Defense date and country2023-02-10, Croatia
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		SOCIAL SCIENCES
Law
Abstract
Presuda na temelju sporazuma stranaka kao novi oblik konsenzualnosti uvedena je u hrvatsko pravo 2008. godine, iako je prethodnica ovom institutu bila presuda na zahtjev stranaka u istrazi, koja je bila uvedena u prijašnji Zakon o kaznenom postupku 2002.godine. Temelji ovog instituta nalaze se u angloameričkom pravnom sustavu. Samo uvođenje ovog instituta predstavlja veliki korak u kontinentalnoj pravnoj tradiciji s obzirom da se dugo vremena na tim područjima nailazilo na nesklonost njegovom... More uvođenju. Rad se na samom početku bavi usporedbom tih dvaju sustava. Naš zakonodavac je pretpostavio da će uvođenjem konsenzualnosti u kazneno procesno pravo, pa tako i presude na temelju sporazuma stranaka, bitno doprinijeti efikasnosti pravosuđa, te racionalizaciji i smanjenju troškova kaznenog postupka, pazeći istodobno da se postignu ciljevi kako generalne tako i specijalne prevencije. Radom su obuhvaćene dvije faze u procesu donošenja presude na temelju sporazuma stranaka. Prva se odvija između državnog odvjetnika i okrivljenika uz obveznu prisutnost okrivljenikovog branitelja, dok se u drugoj fazi usredotočuje na ulogu suda nakon iznošenja sporazuma. Pravna znanost i sudska praksa ukazuju da ovaj oblik sporazumijevanja pored stanovitih prednosti ima i određenih manjkavosti koje se posebno očituju kod uloge okrivljenika, reducirane ovlasti suda, te u odnosu s načelima kaznenoga postupka. Less
Abstract (english)
Judgment based on the agreement off the parties is a new form of consensuality was introduced into Croatian law in 2008. although the predecessor of this institute was a judgment at the request of the parties in the investigation, which was introduced in the previous Criminal Procedure Act year of 2002. The base of this institute are found in the Anglo-American legal system. The introduction of this institute represents a big step in to the continental legal tradition, considering that for... More a long time in these areas was aversion to introduce it. At the beginning this paper deals with the comparasion of these two systems. Our legislator assumed that the introduction of consensuality in criminal procedural law, including judgment based on the agreement off the parties would significantly contribute to the efficiency of the judiciary and the rationalization and reduction of costs of criminal proceedings, while at the same time ensuring that the goals of general and special prevention are achived. The paper covers two stages in the process of making a judgment based on the agreement off the parties. The first takes place between state attorney and the defendant with the mandatory presence of the defender, while the second stage focuses on the role of the court after the agreement is presented. Legal science and judical practice indicate that this form of consensuality in addition to certain advantages also has certain shortcomings, which are particularly evident in the role of the defendant, the reduced authority of the court and in relation to the principles of criminal procedure. Less
Keywords
Keywords (english)
Languagecroatian
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:170:342968
Study programmeTitle: Law
Study programme type: university
Study level: integrated undergraduate and graduate
Academic / professional title: magistar/magistra prava (magistar/magistra prava)
Type of resourceText
File originBorn digital
Access conditionsClosed access
Terms of useLicence In copyright icon
Created on2023-04-13 16:28:17
accessibility

closeAccessibilityrefresh

If you wish to permanently save changes, click on Save, if not - your settings will be reset when you restart the browser.